The fact of aborting the subjects in a very fast and superficial way leaves something to be desired and ends up generating a lot of confusion both in the course and in the programming part. I would need more examples and activities so that knowledge could be absorbed more easily and intuitively. There are some calculation errors in the videos and the lack of some references associated with tables Z and T that generate a lot of doubts and confusion. Anyway, I expected the course to be more organized.

I joined a course to refresh my statistics. I was thrown head first into R Labs without support. I loved the videos and handouts, but did not want to spend hours on R without any help. So I withdrew from the course and started one offered by Stanford University.

The information was amusing sometimes, but the first 2 chapters are sexist. That aside - the "R Lab" is not relevant to the class. Also, the order is backwards - all the interesting theory parts are the last 3 chapters!

This course was awe full To get my certificate, I needed 35 minutes Not worth my time and money

It should be named 'Basic', or say that it doesn't require previous knowledge because it does.

That was the most terrible methodology ever seen in my life. I would stop it.

Very long and I was feeling unmotivated to complete the course

This course is really annoying since it asks me to launch R

i want to unenroll from the course, I am not able to do it.

terminologies overload on the first week of lecture

щщ